I liked the calendar and contacts because they were accessible from my other devices. I've been hooked on some Google services since 2010 when I got a Nexus One phone. Transitioning Away from Google Services.I would be curious what the end agreement money exchange between Ford and Tesla was but I don't think we.
#DIGITALOCEAN OWNCLOUD FREE#
USB-A could be patent free and USB-C may have a small royalty but the UX and cost of manufacture may make USB-C still cheaper. I can run a free Owncloud but it might be cheaper to pay someone else to run my server while I focus on my solution.
#DIGITALOCEAN OWNCLOUD SOFTWARE#
I run some cloud software (forgot the name) in the past and it was very inefficient at synchronizing, Seafile was great with synchronization, but recovery was painful.Īll Ford EV will have access to Tesla Supercharger networkĪlso just because something is "free" doesn't mean it is cheaper. I am not interested in complex cloud hosting systems like. What's your web browser based access to file system?.The so called cure for this is sending your files already encrypted to your file hosting service, but this puts every service provider (google, apple, DO+owncloud) on the same level of inconvenience, because from the hosting standpoint it is exactly the same thing.Īlthough yes, Digital Ocean is not just a file hosting service, for the security/NSA issue it haves the same privacy/security concerns as other commercial options. It hurts the idea of "a Digital Ocean server + OwnCloud is far more secure than any commercial option" because it is subject to monitoring just as any other commercial and evil service. It doesn't really matters how much you hate Dropbox (with or with not Condolezza on their board, doesn't matter), Google Drive or iCloud (with its leaks), these services are ruled by the same set of laws and government agencies that can (and will be) in any moment monitor,record and profile any activity that the users do regarding their files. No, there's not, in a technical standpoint both services are subject to monitoring and, in specific cases, shutdown by express order of a government entity.
Is there that much of a difference in terms of privacy? And if its too permissive (IE dropbox) its also just as good as not doing anything.Ī real security solution is one that is reasonably secure, where you make best efforts to keep it secure and operate the system in a secure way, something verifiable, and something you can integrate into your actual workflow and stick with over the long-term. If you can't use it, its just as good as not having it. Real security, that you can actually use, and not just mentally fap about, is a balance. The only 100% safe bet is a local box, on your LAN, that is protected from ever allowing any data to leave your LAN.įor many of us, that arraignment is not sustainable. And the basis for comparison is: DO "might/could" do something. It's fundamentally comparing two totally different things. How can they be seen as comparable at all? Vs a service that is built from the ground up with one shared encryption key, indexes all of your data as part of its functionality, has worked with DMCA take down requests, and has Condalisa Rice advising it.
#DIGITALOCEAN OWNCLOUD FULL#
Just from a technical standpoint, a VPS that you have full root control over, the option to encrypt the file system, log, audit, self backup, control, etc. Not even getting into how this would undermine DO's business to engage in any of those practices, and the massive finical incentive to leave your data alone. If you want to use Dropbox, just use Dropbox. This question feels like someone really searching to justify to them selves why its ok to use Dropbox. And I've stopped replying because the answer seems really obvious to me.
I see this come in via email all the time.
0 kommentar(er)
